For
It would reduce the influence of wealthy donors.
Against
It forces taxpayers to support parties they do not believe in.
Anonymous excerpts, translated where noted.
“Campaigns would stop being an arms race of fundraising. Smaller candidates could compete without needing massive donor networks.”
“it leads to more competitive primaries and generals and allows for people without rich networks a chance to spend money on par with rich individuals.”
“If direct campaign spending is capped, influence doesn’t disappear. It shifts.”
“government control over the electoral system can allow for manipulation that benefits the incumbent.”