Art

Should public money support art that people do not understand?

For

Art does not need to be simple to have value.

Against

If people cannot relate to it, money is wasted.

Anonymous excerpts, translated where noted.

For

  • cannot be answered objectively, because anything can be art to someone.
    RedditOriginal language: English
  • Art has questionable value, but that does not mean the money spent on it is invisible.
    RedditOriginal language: English

Against

  • Not one dollar of public funding or tax breaks
    RedditOriginal language: English
  • Producing something of merit means nothing unless you are talking about art in a commercial context.
    RedditOriginal language: English
Skip